Alert rules without ownership create mute fatigue and missed outages.
Grafana
Implement Grafana dashboards and alerts your teams will actually use
Dashboard projects often ship pretty graphs without on-call utility. Alerts multiply, folders sprawl, and nobody owns standards — so confidence in Grafana stalls after the first rollout wave.
Scoped delivery Dashboard standards Alert discipline Handover included
Why this matters
Why this matters
Useful dashboards and disciplined alerts shorten incidents and make LGTM spend defensible to engineering leadership.
Dashboard standards speed onboarding — ad hoc folders do the opposite.
Data source sprawl makes upgrades and access reviews harder than necessary.
What you get
Clear outputs you can use
Scoped Grafana implementation: data sources, dashboard packs, alert rules, folder and permissions model, and optional IaC artefacts — with SRE and platform handover.
- ✓ Dashboard and alert packs for agreed services or domains
- ✓ Data source configuration and permissions model documentation
- ✓ Optional IaC or GitOps patterns your platform team can extend
Why teams talk to GKC
Calm, practical, and grounded in the environment you already have
SOW tied to service or domain count — expansions are change-controlled
Built for incident workflows first — not vanity metric walls
Works with Cloud or self-managed Grafana as scoped
What happens next
A straightforward first step
We keep the first step straightforward so you can understand fit, scope, and likely value before deciding what to do next.
1
Agree scope and standards
We confirm services, SLO intent, folder structure, naming, and alert routing expectations.
2
Build and validate
Dashboards, alerts, and data sources are implemented with review from SRE and service owners on representative scenarios.
3
Hand over for day-2
You receive standards, runbooks, and backlog for the next domain wave or backend tuning.
Questions teams often have
Common questions
Our dev teams build their own dashboards. Why GKC?
We often deliver platform standards and golden dashboards — your teams extend within guardrails instead of reinventing alert patterns.
Will you migrate every Datadog dashboard?
Migration parity is a separate, explicitly scoped conversation. This engagement delivers agreed packs — not unlimited recreation.
Does this include Loki pipeline redesign?
Log pipeline work is scoped on Loki optimisation. Implementation assumes ingest paths are workable or fixes are a named dependency.
Related services
If this is close, these may be relevant too
Grafana
Grafana Stack Assessment
A focused assessment of your Grafana/LGTM posture: signal coverage, architecture options, cost drivers, and a prioritised plan for the next 90 days.
Grafana
Prometheus / Mimir Metrics Programme
Bounded Prometheus/Mimir programme: cardinality analysis, recording and aggregation rules, scrape hygiene, and alert-ready metric standards for agreed domains.
Value and Cost Clarity
Observability Health Check
The Observability Health Check is a focused review of how your current setup is performing, where value is being lost, and what to improve first.
Next step
Start with a practical conversation
We can talk through the environment, what is making this feel urgent or uncertain, and whether this service is the right fit. If another starting point makes more sense, we will say so.